|
Title:
God In You
Author:
Charles Finney
Publisher:
Whitaker House
ISBN: 0883685450
Pages: 240
Book Type: Paperback
Size: 0.71 x 8.29 x 5.30 inches
Released Date: Nov 1998
Stock Status:
Available
Price:
$7.50
Reviews
Table Of Contents
Description:
In these pages, Charles Finney delves deeply into
the Scriptures to reveal the true differences between
sinners and saints. You will be moved to examine your
heart, your thoughts, and your actions in light of
the Bible, so that you can reach a higher experience
of God¿s love and power.
Reviews:
Be the first person to review this book!
Table
Of Contents
Introduction --- 7
1. Sinners Must Change Their Own Hearts --- 9
Remarks --- 27
2.How to Change Your Heart --- 43
Remarks --- 59
3.Traditions of the Elders --- 66
Remarks --- 83
4.Total Depravity: Part One --- 89
Remarks --- 103
5.Total Depravity: Part Two --- 108
Remarks --- 122
6.Why Sinners Hate God --- 127
Remarks --- 136
7.God Cannot Please Sinners --- 143
Remarks --- 153
8.Christian Affinity --- 161
Remarks --- 164
9.Stewardship --- 175
Remarks --- 182
10.The Doctrine of Election --- 187
Remarks --- 194
11.Reprobation --- 199
Remarks --- 216
12.The Love of the World --- 220
Remarks --- 234
EXCERPT
Chapter
1 SINNERS MUST CHANGE THEIR OWN HEARTS
Get yourselves a new heart and a new
spirit. For why should you die? Ezekiel 18:31
These words were addressed to Israel,
who, according to their history and the passage from
which our text verse is taken, were evidently in a
state of impenitence. This command to get themselves
"a new heart and a new spirit" was enforced
by the weighty penalty of death. The death mentioned
in the text cannot mean natural death, for natural
death comes to both those who have and those who do
not have a new heart. Nor can it mean spiritual death,
which is a state of entire sinfulness, for then the
verse would have read, "Why are you already dead?"
The death spoken of here must mean eternal death,
or the state of banishment from God and the glory
of His power. It is the state into which the soul
that dies in its iniquities will be cast.
The command here addressed to the Israelites is binding
upon every impenitent sinner to whom the Gospel is
addressed. Sinners are required to perform the same
duty, with the same penalty. Therefore, it becomes
a matter of infinite importance that we well understand,
and fully and immediately obey, the requirement. The
questions that naturally arise when reading the text
verse ask the following:
1. What is meant by the requirement to get a new heart
and a new spirit?
2. Is it reasonable to require the performance of
this duty under the threat of eternal death?
3. How is this requirement consistent with the often
repeated declarations of the Bible that a new heart
is the gift and work of God? Does God require us to
perform this duty, without expecting its fulfillment,
merely to show us our powerlessness and dependence
upon Him? Does He require us to get ourselves a new
heart under the threat of eternal death, when at the
same time He knows we have no power to obey and that
if ever the work is done, He Himself must do the very
thing He requires of us?
In order to answer these questions
satisfactorily, I will attempt to show, first of all,
what is not the meaning of this requirement. Then
I will show what is.
What Is Not Meant by Getting a New
Heart
Note here that, although the Bible
was not given to teach us intellectual ideas, we may
rest assured that all its declarations are in accordance
with true wisdom. In the Bible, the term spirit is
used in different senses: it sometimes means a spiritual
being or moral agent, while in other places it is
used to describe the disposition of a man. In the
latter sense, we say a person has a good or bad spirit,
a lovely or hateful spirit. The word spirit is evidently
used in this sense in the text verse: "Get yourselves
a new heart and a new spirit."
The term heart is also used in various senses in the
Bible: sometimes it appears to be synonymous with
soul; sometimes it evidently means the will, sometimes
the conscience; sometimes it seems to be used so extensively
as to cover all the moral activities of the mind;
and sometimes it refers to a person¿s natural
or social inclinations. In nearly every case, using
the context of the word, one may easily determine
the particular sense in which it is to be understood.
Our task in this chapter is to discover its meaning
as it is used in Ezekiel 18:31, for it is in this
sense that we are required to get ourselves "a
new heart and a new spirit."
I begin, therefore, by saying that heart in this case
does not mean the fleshly heart or the bodily organ.
Nor does getting a new heart mean getting a new soul.
We have one soul, and we do not need another. Also,
we are not required to create any new physical or
mental abilities. We already have all the powers to
choose to follow what is moral or what is not; we
are just as God made us and do not need any alteration
in the substance of mind or body. Nor does this verse
mean that we are required to add to our minds or bodies
any new principle or inclination. We are not to make
any physical change in ourselves.
Some people speak of a change of heart as something
miraculous, something in which the sinner is to be
entirely passive and for which he is to wait as he
would wait for a surgical operation. We need nothing
added to our bodies or minds, nor is it true that
those who have a new heart have any physical alteration
of their powers whatsoever. They are the same people,
as far as both body and mind are concerned, that they
were before. A physical change, either in body or
mind, would destroy a person¿s identity. A
Christian, or one who has a new heart, would not be
the same individual that he was before in regard to
his powers of moral choice- he would not be the same
person having the same responsibilities. The alteration,
therefore, lies in the manner in which he uses his
moral and physical powers.
A physical alteration in the substance of one¿s
mind would also destroy all the virtue of his obedience.
It would make obedience to God a mere gratification
of appetite, in which there would be no more real
virtue than in eating when we are hungry or drinking
when we are thirsty. Think of it: if a principle of
holiness were implanted in the mind, it would render
the perseverance of the saints physically necessary,
make falling from grace a natural impossibility, and
would thus destroy all the virtue of perseverance.
Such a thing would also dispense with the necessity
of the Holy Spirit after conversion. A recreation
of a person¿s mental faculties, and the implantation
of an inclination toward holiness in the substance
of his mind, would plainly dispense with the need
for any other power in his life than the power that
could keep him alive and give him power to act. For,
in obedience to the laws of his renewed nature or
in the gratification of his new appetite, he would,
of course, obey.
But this implantation of a new principle, which dispenses
with the need for the influences of the Holy Spirit
after conversion, is contrary to experience in many
ways. First, those who have a new heart find that
the Holy Spirit¿s constant assistance is as
indispensable to their perseverance in holiness as
it was to their conversion. Second, the idea of a
physical change is inconsistent with backsliding.
If the physical makeup of the mind were changed, if
an inclination toward holiness and obedience were
implanted in the substance of the soul, then to backslide,
or to fall from grace, would be as impossible as to
alter the appetites of the stomach.
A physical change is also unnecessary. Some people
suppose that the Gospel has no real tendency to move
the mind to obey God unless there is a corresponding
affinity to do so in the person. In other words, because
the influences of the Gospel are holy, there must
be something equally holy implanted in the substance
of the mind before these influences can act as influences
at all. Thus, if the outward influence is holy, there
must already be something holy in the person; but
if the outward influence is sinful, the person must
already have corresponding sinful inclinations.
But this is absurd and contrary to fact. Based on
these theories, I must inquire, How did Adam sin?
Was it God or the Devil who first implanted a sinful
inclination within his physical body as an answer
to the outward influence? And how did one third of
the holy angels sin? Did God also implant a sinful
inclination in their beings? Were Adam and "the
angels who did not keep their proper domain"
(Jude 6) originally created with sinful inclinations
that corresponded to those outward influences? Then
they were always sinners and were created as such.
Who, then, is the author of sin and is responsible
for all their wickedness?
It is true, the physical makeup of the mind must be
suited and adapted to the nature of the outward influence
before the influence can produce any desired action
of the mind. And the outward influence must be equally
adapted to the mind. Every human being possesses the
power to understand, to perceive, and to weigh; he
has the power of conscience to decide upon the nature
of moral opposites; he has the power and liberty of
choice. Now, to the person who possesses these faculties,
the influences of the Gospel are directed, and there
is plainly a natural tendency in these weighty considerations
to influence him to obey his Maker.
If a change of heart were physical, it would have
no moral character. In order to have moral character,
the change must be voluntary. But no change to the
nature of man¿s soul, no implantation of a
craving for obedience to God, could bring him to holiness.
All holiness- whether in God, angels, or men- must
be voluntary, or it is not holiness at all. To call
anything holy that is a part of the mind or body,
to speak of a holy substance, unless it is in a figurative
sense, is to talk nonsense. Holiness is virtue; it
is something that is praiseworthy. Therefore, it cannot
be a part of the created substance of the body or
mind but must consist in voluntary obedience to the
principles of eternal righteousness.
|